<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royal Error</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/royal-error/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/royal-error/</link>
	<description>Paul Hoffman on words, chess, food, science, and everything else that's big fun.  An exploration of ideas in my book King's Gambit: A Son, a Father, and the World's Most Dangerous Game.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Korir</title>
		<link>http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/royal-error/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Korir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/royal-error/#comment-563</guid>
		<description>I have always been amused by this stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been amused by this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HagstromCondor</title>
		<link>http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/royal-error/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>HagstromCondor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/royal-error/#comment-538</guid>
		<description>The examples cited by Kenyan Chess Blog and Mr. Panelas make this Rozerem(TM) blunder comparatively forgiveable.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdpOIaGnzvA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The examples cited by Kenyan Chess Blog and Mr. Panelas make this Rozerem(TM) blunder comparatively forgiveable.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdpOIaGnzvA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdpOIaGnzvA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Panelas</title>
		<link>http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/royal-error/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Panelas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/royal-error/#comment-511</guid>
		<description>And it's not just advertising. Look at your March 2007 issue of &lt;i&gt;Chess Life&lt;/i&gt;.  On the cover illustration, both players have pawns of their own on their back ranks.

Maybe everybody knows this already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#8217;s not just advertising. Look at your March 2007 issue of <i>Chess Life</i>.  On the cover illustration, both players have pawns of their own on their back ranks.</p>
<p>Maybe everybody knows this already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shazgood</title>
		<link>http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/royal-error/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Shazgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/royal-error/#comment-503</guid>
		<description>I have postulated the three laws of chess advertisement to explain these badly assembled chess boards:

let me explain the First Law of Chess Advertisement. This states quite categorically, that “you absolutely must make sure to place the pieces the wrong way round for the expensively-assembled photo-shoot.” 

The Second Law of Chess Advertisement goes like this: “You must ban all people who know the basic rules of chess from coming within a hundred yards of the photograph, or have any dealings with editing or publishing the photograph.”

Lastly, the Third Law of Chess Advertisement is not a law of chess or of advertisements at all, but a law of physics and has been demonstrably proved to be as fundamental a law as E=Mc2 or the first and second laws of thermodynamics. It is that in any randomly assembled chess set, the right-hand bottom square is always black.

This was all by-the-by, when I wrote about chocolate chess pieces!
http://shazgood.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/chocolate-chess-pieces/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have postulated the three laws of chess advertisement to explain these badly assembled chess boards:</p>
<p>let me explain the First Law of Chess Advertisement. This states quite categorically, that “you absolutely must make sure to place the pieces the wrong way round for the expensively-assembled photo-shoot.” </p>
<p>The Second Law of Chess Advertisement goes like this: “You must ban all people who know the basic rules of chess from coming within a hundred yards of the photograph, or have any dealings with editing or publishing the photograph.”</p>
<p>Lastly, the Third Law of Chess Advertisement is not a law of chess or of advertisements at all, but a law of physics and has been demonstrably proved to be as fundamental a law as E=Mc2 or the first and second laws of thermodynamics. It is that in any randomly assembled chess set, the right-hand bottom square is always black.</p>
<p>This was all by-the-by, when I wrote about chocolate chess pieces!<br />
<a href="http://shazgood.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/chocolate-chess-pieces/" rel="nofollow">http://shazgood.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/chocolate-chess-pieces/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
