<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Escaping the Mundane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/escaping-the-mundane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/escaping-the-mundane/</link>
	<description>Paul Hoffman on words, chess, food, science, and everything else that's big fun.  An exploration of ideas in my book King's Gambit: A Son, a Father, and the World's Most Dangerous Game.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 18:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: shazgood</title>
		<link>http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/escaping-the-mundane/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>shazgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulhoffman.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/escaping-the-mundane/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>They're not mundane at all of course. It is a common mistake of lay people that maths is "boring" or chess is "boring", but lovers of both beg to differ. How to explain life-long obsessions with either, if they were merely "mundane"? A little thought and a little exploration shows quite the opposite!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re not mundane at all of course. It is a common mistake of lay people that maths is &#8220;boring&#8221; or chess is &#8220;boring&#8221;, but lovers of both beg to differ. How to explain life-long obsessions with either, if they were merely &#8220;mundane&#8221;? A little thought and a little exploration shows quite the opposite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
